Agenda item

Proposal: Outline planning application for the erection of a pair of semi-detached houses with gardens and parking

The Specialist, Development Management, introduced his report and advised that the site was land left within SSDC ownership following the transfer of council housing to Yarlington Homes.  Although there were some local objections, the proposal to build two semi-detached properties in a residential area was acceptable and he recommended the application be approved. 

The Committee was addressed by one local resident.  His comments included:-

• The site is not big enough for two semi-detached houses
• Parking is already a major issue on the estate
• I have tried to purchase the site but was told it was to be used as a community project.

One of the Ward Members, Councillor Louise Clarke, said the site was very small and close to the houses behind it.

The other Ward Member, Councillor Neil Bloomfield, advised that the site had been offered to the Parish Council some time ago but the offer was not taken up.  He said that Martock was a sustainable village and it could cope with two additional houses, however, any additional vehicles would significantly impact on local residents as there was currently nowhere to park in the evenings on that estate. 

In response to questions from Members, the Director for Support Services advised that the site had been identified as an income generation opportunity for the District Council and it would be sold with outline planning permission to increase its value. 

During a brief discussion it was suggested that the site be re-offered to Martock Parish Council to purchase as they may develop a small parking area for local residents.  It was proposed and seconded to defer the application for no more than 4 months to allow discussions with Martock Parish Council.  On being put to the vote, this was carried by 6 in favour, 0 against, 2 abstentions.

1.      To explore alternative ways to dispose of the site, including offering it to Martock Parish Council.

 (Voting: 6 in favour, 0 against, 2 abstentions)