Agenda, decisions and minutes
Venue: Council Chamber, Brympton Way, YEOVIL, Somerset BA20 2HT
Contact: Angela Cox 01935 462148 Email: angela.cox@southsomerset.gov.uk
No. | Item | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Minutes of Previous Meeting To approve as a correct record the minutes of the District Executive meeting held on 1st December 2016. Minutes: The minutes of the District Executive meeting held on 1st December 2016, copes of which had been circulated, were taken as read and, having been approved as a correct record, were signed by the Chairman.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Apologies for Absence Minutes: Apologies for absence were received from Councillor Henry Hobhouse and Rina Singh, Deputy Chief Executive. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Declarations of Interest In accordance with the Council's current Code of Conduct (adopted July 2012), which includes all the provisions relating to Disclosable Pecuniary Interests (DPI), personal and prejudicial interests, Members are asked to declare any DPI and also any personal interests (and whether or not such personal interests are also "prejudicial") in relation to any matter on the Agenda for this meeting. A DPI is defined in The Relevant Authorities (Disclosable Pecuniary Interests) Regulations 2012 (SI 2012 No. 1464) and Appendix 3 of the Council’s Code of Conduct. A personal interest is defined in paragraph 2.8 of the Code and a prejudicial interest is defined in paragraph 2.9. Members are reminded that they need to declare the fact that they are also a member of a County, Town or Parish Council as a Personal Interest. As a result of the change made to the Code of Conduct by this Council at its meeting on 15th May 2014, where you are also a member of Somerset County Council and/or a Town or Parish Council within South Somerset you must declare a prejudicial interest in any business on the agenda where there is a financial benefit or gain or advantage to Somerset County Council and/or a Town or Parish Council which would be at the cost or to the financial disadvantage of South Somerset District Council. If you have a prejudicial interest you must comply with paragraphs 2.9(b) and 2.9(c) of the Code. Minutes: There were no declarations of interest made. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Public Question Time Questions, statements or comments from members of the public are welcome at the beginning of each meeting of the Council. The total period allowed for public participation shall not exceed 15 minutes except with the consent of the Council and each individual speaker shall be restricted to a total of three minutes. Where there are a number of persons wishing to speak about the same matter, they should consider choosing one spokesperson to speak on their behalf where appropriate. If a member of the public wishes to speak they should advise the committee administrator and complete one of the public participation slips setting out their name and the matter they wish to speak about. The public will be invited to speak in the order determined by the Chairman. Answers to questions may be provided at the meeting itself or a written reply will be sent subsequently, as appropriate. Matters raised during the public question session will not be debated by the Council at that meeting. Minutes: There were no questions from members of the public present. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chairman's Announcements Minutes: The Chairman paid tribute to the Scrutiny Manager, Principal Spatial Planner and the Equalities Officer who were all due to shortly leave the Council to take up new posts elsewhere. He was joined by the Scrutiny Chairman, the Leader of the Opposition Group and the Deputy Leader in thanking them all for their support, skills and work during their time at SSDC. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Report from Yeovil District Hospital NHS Foundation Trust PDF 208 KB Decision:
Minutes: Members noted the report provided by Councillor David Recardo as the SSDC representative on the Yeovil District Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and requested that in the future, the full minutes of the meetings be published on the website and a one page precis of the meeting as it related to SSDC, be printed in the Agenda papers.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Direct Hostel Provision, Move On Accommodation and Support PDF 252 KB Decision:
Minutes: The Portfolio Holder for Leisure and Culture advised that the report requested funding towards the provision of a direct access hostel and related services for the very vulnerable. She said homelessness had escalated nationally and the service was needed.
The Assistant Director (Health and Well-Being) reminded Members that as a consequence of SCC cuts to the Pathway for Adults (P4A) service they had agreed to support the service for one year in April 2016. The arrangements had been successfully delivered, and, as the Government had deferred their decision on future funding until April 2019, it was proposed to support the service for the next two years.
Mr Nick Watkins from the Pathway for Adults Hub (P4A) said the last year had been very productive. There had been a spike in the number of young homeless people who they had helped with employment and training opportunities and self-esteem workshops. He said the two year funding would provide security of employment for the staff and he invited Members to view the hostel in Newton Road.
Ms Rachel Dyer from Yeovil for Families (Y4F) said they had started providing floating support for individuals at risk of homelessness in June 2016. She said link works met with individuals once a week and they linked with drug and alcohol agencies for support. Volunteer mentors also helped to build self-esteem.
The Chairman of the Scrutiny Committee thanked the Corporate Strategic Housing Manager for attending the Scrutiny Committee and explaining the report to them. She said they had sought assurance that multi-agency solutions to addressing homelessness were being sought where appropriate and that that the scheme was effectively measured in terms of outcomes achieved particularly in the longer term.
During discussion the following points were made:
· Need to communicate to the public the service which the hostel provides for homeless people. · The public could be better directed to donate money to organisations providing support, food and shelter to the homeless rather than giving money to various people begging in the street. · It was better to give food and drinks to people on the street (who may or may not be actually homeless). · Local Councils could designate Public Space Protection Orders to control aggressive professional begging. · Need to do more to raise public awareness that homelessness is increasing.
At the conclusion of the debate, the Chairman thanked the officers from Pathway for Adults and Yeovil for Families for attending to provide information on their service. Members were pleased to confirm the recommendations of the report.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Council Tax Support Scheme for 2017/18 PDF 254 KB Additional documents:
Decision:
Minutes: The Portfolio Holder for Finance and Legal Services thanked the Scrutiny Task and Finish group for their work in reviewing the Council Tax Reduction Scheme. He said that because of the public sector equality duty, there was a full Equality Analysis of each proposal. He outlined the four proposed changes, three of which were not supported and he noted that the Hardship Scheme had been kept at £30,000 for the year.
The Revenues and Benefits Manager advised that they had considered whether there was a case for changing the 15% minimum payment, however, other Councils which had increased this had found an increase in arrears. He did not wish to add to the pressure of collection and so it was proposed the 15% minimum payment remained the same.
The Chairman of the Scrutiny Committee confirmed that they supported the recommendations and specifically made reference to supporting the recommendation that the current 15% minimum payment be retained whilst the impact of the roll out of Universal Credit was assessed.
The Scrutiny Manager said that a future concern was that funding would decrease as Universal Credit was introduced.
The Chairman confirmed that the impact of Universal Credit would be significant and he had briefed David Warburton MP so that he could lobby the Government on this issue. At the conclusion of the debate, Members were content to propose the recommendations of the report to Council for confirmation.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SSDC Council Tax Support Policy 2017/18 - Appendix 1 PDF 1 MB Minutes: This SSDC Council Tax Support Policy 2017/18 was published on the SSDC website and circulated to Councillors by e-mail on 23rd December 2016. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Strategic Commercial Land and Property Project PDF 328 KB Decision:
Minutes: The Chairman introduced the report and said that the Council needed to evaluate its own property register with a commercial aspect. He drew Members attention to the project scope listed at point 13 in the report and noted that recommendation 1 be amended to ‘fund up to £102,000 of the project from general fund balances’.
The Chief Executive reminded Members of the current uncertain financial future of Councils and the need to be independent of reliance on Government grants. He said the development of a strategy and the resourcing of the Council’s ambitions into the future would provide financial stability. The Council needed to act commercially and take business decisions in a timely manner but also maintain risk and accountability with public money. External advice together with an in-house team could achieve this first stage of producing a Commercial Land and Property Strategy by July 2017.
The Chairman of the Scrutiny Committee said that they supported the principles of becoming more commercially minded to support the Council’s ambition to generate income streams but noted the importance of accountability and transparency when dealing with public funds.
During discussion, Members were generally supportive of the project and noted that although large, higher earning projects were preferred, lots of smaller projects with a smaller return added up.
At the conclusion of the debate, Members were content to confirm the amended recommendations of the report.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Policy for Awarding Private Sector Housing Grants/Loans and other Financial Assistance PDF 246 KB Decision:
Minutes: The Chairman expressed his concern that Yarlington Housing Group may not allow some of their properties to be adapted in the future and also they would no longer undertake minor adaptations at their own expense.
The Environmental Health Manager advised that the main changes to the policy were aimed at accelerating the discharge of patients from hospital. Means testing would cease as it was more expensive to leave a patient in hospital who could potentially be discharged with assistance. Ramps and stair lifts would be loaned and there was a fund of up to £1,000 for smaller items.
The Chairman of the Scrutiny Committee confirmed that they supported the new policy approach and suggested that robust monitoring would be needed to ensure that resources were allocated where they were most needed.
There was no debate and Members were content to confirm the recommendations of the report.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Medium Term Financial Plan and Capital Programme Update 2017/18 PDF 259 KB Additional documents:
Decision:
Minutes: The Portfolio Holder for Finance and Legal Services introduced the report and advised that although the Local Government finance settlement had been confirmed, the assumption was that the maximum council tax uplift would be made each year. He also referred to the clarification which was being sought on the pension costs, the change in New Homes Bonus, the funding for the Somerset Rivers Authority within council tax and the deferment of the capital bids until the Council Plan had been refreshed.
The Assistant Director (Finance and Corporate Services) advised that the final contract details on the Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) Scheme could not be agreed with the contractor and so this anticipated income was not included within the budget. Also, due to the changes the Government was proposing to New Homes Bonus, the budget reliance on it would be reduced.
The Chairman of the Scrutiny Committee thanked the Assistant Director (Finance and Corporate Services) for providing an informative presentation on budget and finance skills for Scrutiny members
Following a brief discussion, Members were content to confirm the current position of the Medium Term Financial Plan and the Capital Programme.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
South Somerset Economic Development Monitoring Report (December 2016) PDF 276 KB Additional documents: Decision:
Minutes: The Portfolio Holder for Strategic Planning (Place Making) thanked the Spatial Policy Team for their work in compiling the report. She drew Members attention to the next steps listed in the report and said that more integrated workshops were required to include Members in the decision making process.
The Principal Spatial Planner introduced the report and said they had looked at what development had been built out, the amount of land under construction, and, forthcoming development yet to start. He said they had reviewed the 14 main settlements across the district and the overall headlines of information between 2006 and 2016. He drew Members attention to the land and floor space information on page 142 and said that although there was some shift towards service sector working there was still a lot of traditional employment work and aerospace industry work in the district.
The Chairman of the Scrutiny Committee confirmed that they were in favour of the proposed integrated workshops to engage with Members.
In response to questions from Members, the Principal Spatial Planner advised:
· There was a disconnect between land and floor space as businesses preferred to expand on their existing site rather than move elsewhere. · Delivering new employment premises was difficult as there was no great financial return and 95% of businesses in the SSDC area employed less than 5 people. · The total number of jobs in South Somerset, as detailed in the table on page 152, showed that the area had recovered from the recession. · There was a need to forge links with businesses to understand what they wanted as just allocating land for employment would not attract jobs. · There was a need to link employment with infrastructure connectivity – particularly in Wincanton where an early review of the Local Plan should address this.
During discussion, Members made the following points:-
· Business parks are growing in non-strategic locations · The mapping of land use to place is very useful although it shows we have not made the best use of Ilminster or the A358. · SSDC should look positively at land off the A303 and invest in infrastructure to get people to work quickly.
At the conclusion of the debate, Members thanked the Policy Planner for her work in compiling the information and were content to agree the recommendations of the report.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
District Executive Forward Plan PDF 78 KB Additional documents: Decision:
Minutes: Members noted the following amendments to the Executive Forward Plan:-
· Charging for Mobile Home Sites – moved to May 2017 · Proposed redevelopment of Yeovil Crematorium – moved to March 2017 · SSDC Data Protection Policy – moved to March 2017 · *New* Loan to Somerset Waste Partnership for new Waste Vehicles – February 2017 · Final Recommendation of the Community Governance Review of Brympton Parish Council – February 2017 · *New* Pay Policy Statement for Chief Officers - Statement for Financial Year 2016 – 2017 – February 2017
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date of Next Meeting PDF 17 KB Minutes: Members noted that the next scheduled meeting of the District Executive would take place on Wednesday 1st February 2017 in the Council Chamber, Council Offices, Brympton Way, Yeovil commencing at 9.30 a.m. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exclusion of Press and Public PDF 72 KB Decision:
Minutes:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Disposal of the former Stables at Churchfield, Wincanton (Confidential) Decision:
Minutes: Councillor Nick Weeks proposed that the decision to dispose of the former Stables at Churchfield, Wincanton be deferred for one year.
The Chief Executive confirmed that there would shortly be a review of all SSDC-owned operational property.
Following a brief discussion, Members were content to agree to defer the disposal of the former Stables at Churchfield, Wincanton.
|