Items
| No. |
Item |
121. |
Minutes of Previous Meeting
To approve as a
correct record the minutes of the District Executive meeting held
on 5th January 2017.
Minutes:
The minutes of the
District Executive meeting held on 5th January 2017,
copes of which had been circulated, were taken as read and, having
been approved as a correct record, were signed by the Chairman.
|
122. |
Apologies for Absence
Minutes:
Apologies for
absence were received from Councillor Angie Singleton, Alex
Parmley, Chief Executive, and Rina Singh, Deputy Chief
Executive.
|
123. |
Declarations of Interest
In accordance with the
Council's current Code of Conduct (as amended 26 February 2015),
which includes all the provisions relating to Disclosable Pecuniary
Interests (DPI), personal and prejudicial interests, Members are
asked to declare any DPI and also any personal interests (and
whether or not such personal interests are also "prejudicial") in
relation to any matter on the Agenda for this meeting.
Members are reminded that they need to declare the fact that
they are also a member of a County, Town or Parish Council as a
Personal Interest. Where you are also a member of Somerset County
Council and/or a Town or Parish Council within South Somerset you
must declare a prejudicial interest in any business on the agenda
where there is a financial benefit or gain or advantage to Somerset
County Council and/or a Town or Parish Council which would be at
the cost or to the financial disadvantage of South Somerset
District Council.
Minutes:
Councillor Peter
Seib declared a personal interest in Agenda item 14: Final
Recommendation of the Community Governance Review of Brympton Parish Council, as a member of the Parish
Council.
|
124. |
Public Question Time
Minutes:
The Chairman agreed
that members of the public present could speak at the time their
item of interest was discussed.
|
125. |
Chairman's Announcements
Minutes:
The Chairman was
pleased to announce the safe arrival of the Chief Executive and his
wife’s new baby boy the previous day.
|
126. |
Somerset Waste Partnership - Draft Business Plan 2017-22 PDF 218 KB
Additional documents:
Decision:
|
RESOLVED:
|
That District Executive:
|
|
|
1.
|
approved the
Draft SWP Business Plan 2017-22 on behalf of the
authority.
|
|
|
2.
|
provided the following suggestion for the Board to consider or
for inclusion in the next iteration of the Plan:
·
The reinstatement of funding for promotion of
recycling in schools.
|
|
Reason:
|
To
review and confirm the Somerset Waste Partnership's Business Plan
2017-22.
|
Minutes:
The Portfolio
Holder for Waste and Recycling,
introduced the report and drew Members attention to the proposed 3
weekly refuse collections and the enhanced recycling
service. She noted that although some
residents were unhappy at the use of Dimmer as a Waste Transfer
Station, the waste sent to Avonmouth
would be converted into energy.
Mr M
Roberts then spoke on behalf of Cary Moor Parish
Council. He said Dimmer had a long and
controversial history due to the poor access road. The Managing Director of the Somerset Waste
Partnership had said the site was time limited and it would close
in some years however this appeared to contradict what had been
said by planning officers and Viridor
representatives at a SCC Regulation Committee meeting. He expressed concern that information regarding
the business case for siting a waste transfer station at Dimmer had
not been made available and called for it to be
provided.
The Managing
Director, Somerset Waste Partnership confirmed that he would share
as much information on the business case as was possible, however,
some relating to alternative sites was commercially
confidential. It had been important not
to compromise the SWP’s negotiating position when looking at
alternative sites. He also mentioned
that the permit scheme for commercial vehicles and trailers at
Household Waste Recycling Centres (HWRC’s) appeared to have
been successful in reducing the amount of material coming in from
outside the county. The issue of charging residents to use the HWRC
in Crewkerne would need to be revisited due to change of law and
this would be part of a wider review of recycling sites.
Further information on the Recycle More
project would be issued in June 2017 and roll out in the SSDC area
would commence in the autumn and conclude in 2018.
The Chairman of the
Scrutiny Committee said they had requested further information on
refuse treatment and the Recycle More project, mentioned in the
report. They had also received
representations from the public on the use of Dimmer as a Waste
Transfer Station and they would be forwarding their concerns to the
Somerset Joint Waste Scrutiny Committee and also to SCC’s
Scrutiny Committee. They were also
pleased to note that the proposed new council for Taunton Deane BC
and West Somerset Council was a low risk but required review of the
inter-Authority agreement.
In response to
questions from Members, the Managing Director of the Somerset Waste
Partnership advised:-
·
There were no immediate plans to relocate the waste vehicles away
from the Lufton Depot, however, it was
an aspiration to consolidate them in one central location at a
future date.
·
The former Secretary of State for the DCLG had issued an Order
stating that Community Recycling Centres must operate within S51 of
the Environmental Protection Act 1990 and should not charge for
admission.
·
It was usual for local authorities to enter into long term
contracts without break clauses for projects of this nature, in
order to secure the best price. The
Pennon Group were making a ...
view the full minutes text for item 126.
|
127. |
Loan to Somerset Waste Partnership for Waste Vehicles PDF 151 KB
Decision:
|
RESOLVED:
|
That District Executive agreed:
|
|
|
1.
|
to
request that Full Council approve the loan of £3.5 million to
Somerset Waste Partnership towards the
purchase of new recycling vehicles;
|
|
|
2.
|
to
note that this capital expenditure would be added to the Capital
Programme, and that the principal payments received would be
capital receipts;
|
|
|
3.
|
to note the
additional interest in the region of £29,255 per annum would
be added to the Medium Term Financial Plan for 2018/19.
|
|
Reason:
|
To
seek approval for South Somerset District Council to loan the
Somerset Waste Partnership (SWP) £3.5 million towards the
purchase of new refuse vehicles.
|
Minutes:
The Chairman
advised that in loaning the money towards the purchase of the new
recycling vehicles, SSDC would retain a charge on them in the event
of any subsequent collapse of the contract to collect waste and
recycling.
In response to a
question, the Assistant Director (Finance and Corporate Services)
confirmed that Somerset County Council would reclaim the VAT from
HMRC on the purchased vehicles.
The Chairman of the
Scrutiny Committee confirmed their support for the recommendation
as the interest received would be in excess of what was currently
being received.
There was no debate
and Members were content to propose the recommendations to Full
Council for approval.
|
RESOLVED:
|
That District Executive agreed:
|
|
|
1.
|
to
request that Full Council approve the loan of £3.5 million to
Somerset Waste Partnership towards the
purchase of new recycling vehicles;
|
|
|
2.
|
to
note that this capital expenditure would be added to the Capital
Programme, and that the principal payments received would be
capital receipts;
|
|
|
3.
|
to note the
additional interest in the region of £29,255 per annum would
be added to the Medium Term Financial Plan for 2018/19.
|
|
Reason:
|
To
seek approval for South Somerset District Council to loan the
Somerset Waste Partnership (SWP) £3.5 million towards the
purchase of new refuse vehicles.
|
|
128. |
Heart of the South West Devolution Update PDF 211 KB
Decision:
|
RESOLVED:
|
That District Executive endorsed and recommended that Full
Council:
|
|
|
1.
|
notes the update about the Heart of the South West (HotSW) Combined Authority / devolution deal
proposals (including noting that a Joint Committee, if established,
will have responsibility for developing future ‘deal’
and combined authority proposals for recommendation to the
constituent authorities);
|
|
|
2.
|
approves the proposals for the
HotSW Productivity Plan preparation and
consultation proposals (including noting that a Joint Committee, if
established, will have responsibility for approving and overseeing
the implementation of the Productivity Plan);
|
|
|
3.
|
agrees:
(a) ‘In
principle’ to the establishment of a HotSW Joint Committee with a Commencement Date of
Friday 1st September 2017 in accordance with the summary proposals
set out in this report;
(b) That the
‘in principle’ decision at (a) above is subject to
further recommendation and report to the constituent authorities
after the County Council elections in May 2017 and confirmatory
decisions to: approve the establishment of the Joint Committee; a
constitutional ‘Arrangements’ document; an
‘Inter-Authority Agreement’ setting out the support
arrangements; appoint representatives to the Join Committee; and
appoint an Administering Authority.
|
|
Reason:
|
The
urgent and essential need to improve productivity across the
HotSW area is the driver for the
recommendations in this report.
|
Minutes:
The Chairman
advised that councils in the South West were no longer moving
towards devolution however, they had worked well together and so it
was proposed that they form a Joint Committee to produce a
productivity plan in order to gain some influence over the Local
Enterprise Partnership (LEP).
The Chairman of the
Scrutiny Committee said they supported the recommendations
but had concerns that they did not have enough
sufficient information and so would be discussing this and the role of Scrutiny at their next
meeting.
There was no debate
and Members were content to propose the recommendations to Full
Council.
|
RESOLVED:
|
That District Executive endorsed and recommended that Full
Council:
|
|
|
1.
|
notes the update about the Heart of the South West (HotSW) Combined Authority / devolution deal
proposals (including noting that a Joint Committee, if established,
will have responsibility for developing future ‘deal’
and combined authority proposals for recommendation to the
constituent authorities);
|
|
|
2.
|
approves the proposals for the
HotSW Productivity Plan preparation and
consultation proposals (including noting that a Joint Committee, if
established, will have responsibility for approving and overseeing
the implementation of the Productivity Plan);
|
|
|
3.
|
agrees:
(a) ‘In
principle’ to the establishment of a HotSW Joint Committee with a Commencement Date of
Friday 1st September 2017 in accordance with the summary proposals
set out in this report;
(b) That the
‘in principle’ decision at (a) above is subject to
further recommendation and report to the constituent authorities
after the County Council elections in May 2017 and confirmatory
decisions to: approve the establishment of the Joint Committee; a
constitutional ‘Arrangements’ document; an
‘Inter-Authority Agreement’ setting out the support
arrangements; appoint representatives to the Join Committee; and
appoint an Administering Authority.
|
|
Reason:
|
The
urgent and essential need to improve productivity across the
HotSW area is the driver for the
recommendations in this report.
|
|
129. |
Revenue Budget 2017/18 - Medium Term Financial Plan and Capital Programme PDF 343 KB
Additional documents:
Decision:
|
RESOLVED:
|
That District Executive endorsed and recommended that Full
Council agree to:
|
|
|
a.
|
approval of the overall Revenue Budget for 2017/18 of £17,379,200 and the Revenue Account Summary as shown
at Appendix A and note future year projections outlined in
paragraph 33;
|
|
|
b.
|
approval of the detailed budgets for the
District Executive and four Area Committees as shown at Appendix
B;
|
|
|
c.
|
approve
the increase of £5.00 per annum in the Council Tax for
2017/18 for South Somerset District Council, which will result in a
Band D charge of £157.48;
|
|
|
d.
|
approve
the transfer of £109,729 to the Somerset Rivers
Authority;
|
|
|
e.
|
approval
of the additional expenditure for budget pressure bids and removal
of 16/17 once offs as shown in Appendix C;
|
|
|
f.
|
approval
of the savings proposals in Appendix D in conjunction with the
equalities checks;
|
|
|
g.
|
note the
current position and future estimation of reserves and balances as
shown in paragraphs 59-62;
|
|
|
h.
|
note the
deferral of new capital schemes pending the finalisation of the
Council Plan 2017/18 Annual Plan;
|
|
|
i.
|
note the
Minimum Revenue Provision (MRP) Statement and Capital Prudential
Indicators as attached at Appendix E.
|
|
Reason:
|
To
seek approval for the proposed 2017/18 Revenue Budget, Medium Term
Financial Plan (Revenue Budgets for 2017/18 to 2021/22) that will
be recommended to Full Council.
|
Minutes:
The Assistant
Director (Finance and Corporate Services) introduced the report and
drew Members attention to its main points. She noted that the capital projects would be
presented in March 2017 along with the new Council
Plan.
The Chairman
reminded Members that a workshop was scheduled for 21st
February to discuss future budget priorities.
In response to questions, it was noted that:-
·
The current Car Parking Strategy was still valid and was being
reviewed by the Senior Leadership Team.
·
Most of the Somerset Councils were raising their council tax by
£5.00.
·
All the Somerset authorities were precepting for the Somerset Rivers Authority.
At the conclusion
of the debate, Members were content to endorse the 2017/18 Revenue Budget and Medium Term Financial Plan and
propose them for confirmation by Full Council.
|
RESOLVED:
|
That
District Executive endorsed and recommended that Full Council agree
to:
|
|
|
a.
|
approval of the overall Revenue Budget for 2017/18 of £17,379,200 and the Revenue Account Summary as shown
at Appendix A and note future year projections outlined in
paragraph 33;
|
|
|
b.
|
approval of the detailed budgets for the
District Executive and four Area Committees as shown at Appendix
B;
|
|
|
c.
|
approve
the increase of £5.00 per annum in the Council Tax for
2017/18 for South Somerset District Council, which will result in a
Band D charge of £157.48;
|
|
|
d.
|
approve
the transfer of £109,729 to the Somerset Rivers
Authority;
|
|
|
e.
|
approval
of the additional expenditure for budget pressure bids and removal
of 16/17 once offs as shown in Appendix C;
|
|
|
f.
|
approval
of the savings proposals in Appendix D in conjunction with the
equalities checks;
|
|
|
g.
|
note the
current position and future estimation of reserves and balances as
shown in paragraphs 59-62;
|
|
|
h.
|
note the
deferral of new capital schemes pending the finalisation of the
Council Plan 2017/18 Annual Plan;
|
|
|
i.
|
note the
Minimum Revenue Provision (MRP) Statement and Capital Prudential
Indicators as attached at Appendix E.
|
|
Reason:
|
To
seek approval for the proposed 2017/18 Revenue Budget, Medium Term
Financial Plan (Revenue Budgets for 2017/18 to 2021/22) that will
be recommended to Full Council.
|
|
130. |
2016/17 Revenue Budget Monitoring Report for the quarter ending 31st December 2016 PDF 266 KB
Additional documents:
Decision:
|
RESOLVED:
|
That District Executive agreed to:
|
|
|
a.
|
note
the current 2016/17 financial position of the Council;
|
|
|
b.
|
note the reasons for variations to the
previously approved Directorate Budgets as detailed in paragraphs
3.2;
|
|
|
c.
|
note the
transfers made to and from reserves outlined in paragraph 11.2 and
the position of the Area Reserves as detailed in Appendix C and the
Corporate Reserves as detailed in Appendix D;
|
|
|
d.
|
note the
virements made under delegated
authority as detailed in Appendix B;
|
|
|
e.
|
return
the save to earn reserve of £50,000 to general
balances.
|
|
Reason:
|
To
agree the current financial position of the revenue budgets of the
Council and to report the reasons for variations from approved
budgets for the period 1st April to 31st
December 2016.
|
Minutes:
The Assistant
Director (Finance and Corporate Services) confirmed that there
should be a small budget underspend by
the end of the financial year.
The Chairman of the
Scrutiny Committee said they had expressed concern at the number of
outstanding applications for Discretionary Housing Payments listed
in the report. The Chairman agreed they
were concerning and said he had briefed David Warburton MP on this
issue. He said it may also be necessary
to use discretionary funding to cover this and if so, a report
would be presented to District Executive.
In response to a
question, the Assistant Director (Finance and Corporate Services)
confirmed that when the senior leadership structure was confirmed
by Full Council, it was agreed it should financially break even and
the report confirmed this had been met.
At the conclusion
of the debate, Members were content to confirm the recommendations
of the report.
|
RESOLVED:
|
That District Executive agreed to:
|
|
|
a.
|
note
the current 2016/17 financial position of the Council;
|
|
|
b.
|
note the reasons for variations to the
previously approved Directorate Budgets as detailed in paragraphs
3.2;
|
|
|
c.
|
note the
transfers made to and from reserves outlined in paragraph 11.2 and
the position of the Area Reserves as detailed in Appendix C and the
Corporate Reserves as detailed in Appendix D;
|
|
|
d.
|
note the
virements made under delegated
authority as detailed in Appendix B;
|
|
|
e.
|
return
the save to earn reserve of £50,000 to general
balances.
|
|
Reason:
|
To
agree the current financial position of the revenue budgets of the
Council and to report the reasons for variations from approved
budgets for the period 1st April to 31st
December 2016.
|
|
131. |
2016/17 Capital Budget Monitoring Report for the quarter ending 31st December 2016 PDF 250 KB
Additional documents:
Decision:
|
RESOLVED:
|
That District Executive agreed to:
|
|
|
a.
|
approve the revised capital programme spend as detailed in
paragraph 6;
|
|
|
b.
|
note the slippage over £50,000 in
the capital programme as detailed in
paragraph 8;
|
|
|
c.
|
approve
the virements of £30,000 outline
in paragraph 9;
|
|
|
d.
|
note the
allocation of additional funding to be used within the capital
programme as detailed in paragraph 11;
|
|
|
e.
|
note the
balance of capital receipts received for utilisation on the
transformation programme in paragraph 12;
|
|
|
f.
|
note the
total land disposals to registered social landlords as detailed in
paragraph 13;
|
|
|
g.
|
note the
balance of S106 deposits by developers held in paragraph
14;
|
|
|
h.
|
note the
current position with regard to funds held by the Wessex Home
Improvement Loans as detailed in paragraph 15;
|
|
|
i.
|
note the
progress of individual capital schemes as detailed in Appendix
A;
|
|
|
j.
|
note the
schemes that were approved prior to 2012, as detailed in Appendix
B.
|
|
Reason:
|
To
agree the current financial position of the capital programme of
the Council and to report the reasons for variations from approved
budgets for the period 1st October 2016 to
31st December 2016.
|
Minutes:
The Assistant
Director asked if Members were minded to confirm whether the
capital schemes approved prior to 2012 should remain in the
programme.
In response to
questions from the Scrutiny Committee, the Chairman confirmed
that:
·
the Market Towns Investment Group would
continue and its funding was originally Government funding
specifically for the project so it was not appropriate to use for
other schemes.
·
the new car parking in Crewkerne was progressing but it was now
part of a larger project to maximise the opportunities in that
area.
There was no
further debate and Members were content to confirm the
recommendations of the report.
|
RESOLVED:
|
That District Executive agreed to:
|
|
|
a.
|
approve the revised capital programme spend as detailed in
paragraph 6;
|
|
|
b.
|
note the slippage over £50,000 in
the capital programme as detailed in
paragraph 8;
|
|
|
c.
|
approve
the virements of £30,000 outline
in paragraph 9;
|
|
|
d.
|
note the
allocation of additional funding to be used within the capital
programme as detailed in paragraph 11;
|
|
|
e.
|
note the
balance of capital receipts received for utilisation on the
transformation programme in paragraph 12;
|
|
|
f.
|
note the
total land disposals to registered social landlords as detailed in
paragraph 13;
|
|
|
g.
|
note the
balance of S106 deposits by developers held in paragraph
14;
|
|
|
h.
|
note the
current position with regard to funds held by the Wessex Home
Improvement Loans as detailed in paragraph 15;
|
|
|
i.
|
note the
progress of individual capital schemes as detailed in Appendix
A;
|
|
|
j.
|
note the
schemes that were approved prior to 2012, as detailed in Appendix
B.
|
|
Reason:
|
To
agree the current financial position of the capital programme of
the Council and to report the reasons for variations from approved
budgets for the period 1st October 2016 to
31st December 2016.
|
|
132. |
Public Space Protection Order for dog fouling, dogs on leads and dog exclusion area PDF 173 KB
Additional documents:
Decision:
|
RESOLVED:
|
That District Executive agreed:
|
|
|
a.
|
to
introduce the two new Public Space Protection Orders: one for dog
fouling and dogs on leads across the district and one for dog
exclusion at the fenced area at Yeovil Country Park, as set out in
Annex 1 of the Agenda report;
|
|
|
b.
|
to
set the level of fixed penalty notices for contravening the Public
Space Protection Orders at £80, reduced to £50 if paid
within 10 days;
|
|
|
c.
|
that
the change in legislation be advised to all Town & Parish
Councils detailing the requirements should they wish to request a
PSPO in their locality.
|
|
Reason:
|
To agree
to the approval of two Public Space Protection Orders; one for dog
fouling and dogs on leads across the district and one for dog
exclusion at the fenced area at Yeovil Country Park.
|
Minutes:
The Portfolio
Holder for Environmental Health and Democratic Services introduced
the report which she said was due to a change in legislation.
The Principal
Environmental Protection Officer advised that the existing Dog
Control Orders were now superseded by Public Space Protection
Orders. Public consultation had taken
place and all responses were in support of the introduction of
PSPO’s. She then outlined the two
proposed orders covering dog fouling and dogs on
leads on public land across the district and one for dog
exclusion at the fenced area at Yeovil Country Park.
In response to
questions from Members, the Principal Environmental Protection
Officer confirmed that:-
·
Only the District Council could introduce Public Space Protection
Orders and any new PSPO must be evidence based for a particular
location.
·
It would be impossible to provide signage of the Orders on every
piece of public land across the district.
·
Although the Council had not issued any fixed penalty notices
within the previous 12 months, the Orders did act as a
deterrent.
At the conclusion
of the debate, it was agreed that the change in legislation be
notified to all Town & Parish Councils detailing the
requirements should they wish to request a PSPO in their
locality. With this additional
recommendation, Members were content to confirm the introduction of
the proposed Public Space Protection Orders and the associated
level of fixed penalty notices.
|
RESOLVED:
|
That District Executive agreed:
|
|
|
a.
|
to
introduce the two new Public Space Protection Orders: one for dog
fouling and dogs on leads across the district and one for dog
exclusion at the fenced area at Yeovil Country Park, as set out in
Annex 1 of the Agenda report;
|
|
|
b.
|
to
set the level of fixed penalty notices for contravening the Public
Space Protection Orders at £80, reduced to £50 if paid
within 10 days;
|
|
|
c.
|
that
the change in legislation be advised to all Town & Parish
Councils detailing the requirements should they wish to request a
PSPO in their locality.
|
|
Reason:
|
To agree
to the approval of two Public Space Protection Orders; one for dog
fouling and dogs on leads across the district and one for dog
exclusion at the fenced area at Yeovil Country Park.
|
|
133. |
Allowenshay Private Water Supply PDF 180 KB
Additional documents:
Decision:
|
RESOLVED:
|
That
District Executive agreed to take no further action on the
Allowenshay Private Water Supply after
considering that all reasonable efforts to resolve the
matterhad been made.
|
|
Reason:
|
To
consider the options available following partial non-compliance
with a notice served under Section 80 of the Water Industry Act
1991 regarding improvements to the private water supply in the
village of Allowenshay.
|
Minutes:
The Committee were
addressed by Gillian Brierley, Chris Baranowski, Susan Gibson, Paul Tomlin and David
Gordon, residents of Allowenshay,
regarding their water supply. Their
comments included:-
·
Neither of the two water supplies in operation worked properly.
·
The Rutter family had not supplied any quotes or given any
indication of ongoing maintenance if connected to the Allowenshay Water Company.
·
It was the Council’s duty to enforce a wholesome water
supply.
·
Only Rutter Brothers should be accountable.
·
The community would prefer a mains water connection.
The Committee was
also addressed by Mr Robert Wood, on behalf of the Rutter
family. He said that in 2013, a cost of
connecting the village to mains water through Wessex Water was
obtained but was rejected due to the cost (over
£250,000). He outlined the works
carried out by the Rutter family to the water supply and their
offer to include the profit from a building plot if the residents
agreed to share the cost of connecting to the Allowenshay Water Company. He said the proposed recommended option in the
report would fulfil all the requirements of the S80 Notice.
The Legal Services
Manager said that under the relevant legislation, the Council had
a discretion to take action, however, if
the water was unwholesome then they had a duty to act. The Section 80 Notice under the Water Industry Act
1981 was issued to the Rutter Bros (as they had maintained the
water supply) under an insufficiency of supply and carried no
criminal proceedings so there was no power to
prosecute. Should SSDC decide to
facilitate a water connection for the village, it would involve
considerable expense and could involve court action to recoup costs
if residents did not contribute.
The Principal
Environmental Protection Officer outlined the history of the
Council’s involvement in the water supply in Allowenshay which led to the serving of a Section
80 Notice under the Water Industry Act 1981. She confirmed that where a private water supply
was provided, the Council had regulatory powers to ensure it was
wholesome and sufficient, but, there was no duty to insist it was
supplied.
During a lengthy
discussion, Members concluded that the Council should not be drawn
into what was a civil matter. The
original recommendation to offer the residents the option to apply
for a low cost loan to assist with connection to a water supply was
proposed and seconded, however, when put
to the vote, this was lost (voting, 3 in favour, 5
against). The Chairman then proposed
that the Council take no further action on the Allowenshay Private Water Supply after considering
that all reasonable efforts to resolve the matter had been made.
This was seconded and unanimously agreed by Members.
|
RESOLVED:
|
That
District Executive agreed to take no further action on the
Allowenshay Private Water Supply after
considering that all reasonable efforts to resolve the
matterhad been made.
|
|
Reason:
|
To
consider the options available following partial non-compliance
with a notice served under Section 80 of the Water ...
view the full minutes text for item 133.
|
|
134. |
Final Recommendation of the Community Governance Review of Brympton Parish Council PDF 173 KB
Decision:
|
RESOLVED:
|
That District Executive recommend that Council:
|
|
|
i.
|
note the results of the consultation and
agree to publish them
|
|
|
ii.
|
agree that the final recommendation be:
“To accept the vote from the people of Brympton to agree to increase the number of Parish
Councillors to twelve”
|
|
|
iii.
|
agree to draw up a Reorganisation
Order to give effect to this recommendation.
|
|
Reason:
|
To
report the outcome of
the final public consultation (Community Governance Review) which
has taken place in the parish of Brympton on the proposal to increase the number of
Parish Councillors from eleven to
twelve (under the provisions of Part 4 of the Local Government and
Public Involvement in Health Act 2007).
|
Minutes:
There was no debate
on this item and Members were content to propose the
recommendations to Full Council for confirmation.
|
RESOLVED:
|
That District Executive recommend that Council:
|
|
|
i.
|
note the results of the consultation and
agree to publish them
|
|
|
ii.
|
agree that the final recommendation be:
“To accept the vote from the people of Brympton to agree to increase the number of Parish
Councillors to twelve”
|
|
|
iii.
|
agree to draw up a Reorganisation
Order to give effect to this recommendation.
|
|
Reason:
|
To
report the outcome of
the final public consultation (Community Governance Review) which
has taken place in the parish of Brympton on the proposal to increase the number of
Parish Councillors from eleven to
twelve (under the provisions of Part 4 of the Local Government and
Public Involvement in Health Act 2007).
|
|
135. |
District Executive Forward Plan PDF 78 KB
Additional documents:
Decision:
|
RESOLVED:
|
That the District Executive:-
|
|
|
1.
|
approved
the updated Executive Forward Plan for publication as attached at
Appendix A, with the following amendments;
- Revisions
to the Discretionary Rate Relief Policy for 2017/18 – March
2017
|
|
|
2.
|
noted the
contents of the Consultation Database as shown at Appendix B, with
the following additional consultation:
- Building
our Industrial Strategy.
|
|
Reason:
|
The Forward Plan is a statutory document.
|
Minutes:
Members noted the
following amendments and additions to the Executive Forward Plan
and Consultation Database:-
·
Revisions to the Discretionary Rate Relief Policy for 2017/18
– March 2017
·
Building our Industrial Strategy Consultation
|
RESOLVED:
|
That the District Executive:-
|
|
|
1.
|
approved
the updated Executive Forward Plan for publication as attached at
Appendix A, with the following amendments;
- Revisions
to the Discretionary Rate Relief Policy for 2017/18 – March
2017
|
|
|
2.
|
noted the
contents of the Consultation Database as shown at Appendix B, with
the following additional consultation:
- Building
our Industrial Strategy.
|
|
Reason:
|
The Forward Plan is a statutory document.
|
|
136. |
Date of Next Meeting PDF 17 KB
Minutes:
Members noted that
the next scheduled meeting of the District Executive would take
place on Thursday 2nd March 2017 in the Council Chamber,
Council Offices, Brympton Way, Yeovil
commencing at 9.30 a.m.
|