Agenda, decisions and minutes
Venue: Virtual Meeting using Zoom meeting software. View directions
Contact: Angela Cox, Democratic Services Specialist - 01935 462148 Email: angela.cox@southsomerset.gov.uk
No. | Item | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Minutes of Previous Meeting To approve as a correct record the minutes of the District Executive meeting held on 04 November 2021. Minutes: The minutes of the previous meeting held on 4th November 2021 were approved as a correct record and would be signed by the Chairman. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Apologies for Absence Minutes: An apology for absence was received from Councillor John Clark. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Declarations of Interest In accordance with the Council's current Code of Conduct (as amended 26 February 2015), which includes all the provisions relating to Disclosable Pecuniary Interests (DPI), personal and prejudicial interests, Members are asked to declare any DPI and also any personal interests (and whether or not such personal interests are also "prejudicial") in relation to any matter on the Agenda for this meeting. Members are reminded that they need to declare the fact that they are also a member of a County, Town or Parish Council as a Personal Interest. Where you are also a member of Somerset County Council and/or a Town or Parish Council within South Somerset you must declare a prejudicial interest in any business on the agenda where there is a financial benefit or gain or advantage to Somerset County Council and/or a Town or Parish Council which would be at the cost or to the financial disadvantage of South Somerset District Council. Minutes: There were no declarations of interest made by Members. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Public Question Time Minutes: There were no questions from members of the public. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chairman's Announcements Minutes: The Chairman advised that Councillor Paul Maxwell was now recovering following a period in hospital.
The Chairman also reported that the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities had confirmed that the elections for the new Unitary Authority for Somerset would take place on 5th May 2022 and it would be a continuing authority. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate Health & Safety Policy PDF 278 KB Additional documents: Decision:
Minutes: The Chairman introduced the report and said it was important for staff, the public and Councillors to keep the Council’s Health and Safety policy current.
The Lead Specialist for Strategic Planning advised that following consideration of the report at the Scrutiny Committee, she provided the following responses:-
· The asbestos register was in place and checks were made to properties prior to purchase. · The RIDDOR acronym (Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations)would be fully explained in the policy. · Checks to SSDC land holdings would be confirmed to the individual Councillor. · The number of incidents and accidents for the last quarter would be circulated to Scrutiny Committee members and the full report would be presented to Audit Committee as planned.
In response to a question regarding contractors, the Lead Specialist for Strategic Planning advised that she would check and respond at Council.
The recommendations were unanimously proposed to Council.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chard Shop Front Design Guide PDF 263 KB Additional documents:
Decision:
Minutes: The Portfolio Holder for the Chard Regeneration Scheme introduced the report to agree consultation on the draft Chard Shop Front Design Guide. He said this was the next step of the town’s regeneration scheme.
The Chard High Street Heritage Action Zone Manager introduced Jo Hibbert, Conservation Architect, who had been commissioned to write the Shop Front Design Guide. She said the purpose of the design guide was to provide clear and consistent guidance for those replacing or installing a new shop fronts in the town centre.
In response to questions raised at the Scrutiny Committee meeting and from Members, the Chard High Street Heritage Action Zone Manager and the Conservation Architect advised:
· The design guide would be adopted as a supplementary planning document to provide additional guidance to the Local Plan and would not introduce new policies. · It was hoped to launch the high street shopfront improvement grants scheme in January 2022. · The project was funded by £1m from Historic England and £1m from SSDC and the total budget was £2.4m with some additional grant funding. · Environmental measures were not particularly mentioned in the design guide but if they were affordable and achievable within the shop frames then they would be encouraged.
During discussion it was noted that a similar scheme had been very successful in Yeovil some years ago and also some shops in Bath had triple-glazed shop windows made by a local company.
At the conclusion of the debate, Members unanimously proposed that the Chief Executive approve the draft Chard Shop Front Design Guide (Appendix A) for formal consultation.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
COVID Recovery and Renewal Strategy: six months’ progress report PDF 315 KB Additional documents:
Decision:
Minutes: The Chairman said she was impressed with the progress made by officers in the delivery of the Recovery and Renewal Strategy as detailed in the report.
In response to points raised by Scrutiny Committee members, the Lead Specialist for Economy, Place and Recovery advised:-
· When the plan was approved by District Executive in April 2021, it had been noted that a long term view to work through issues and reach full recovery from COVID was part of the plan. · There had been some challenges and staffing issues to the priority to improve the SSDC customer journey (step 4) and a full written response would be provided to the Scrutiny Committee.
He concluded that good progress had been made on 10 of the 11 key step objectives within the plan which were all on track to deliver. He noted that it was no longer felt necessary to set up another Recovery Board as staff were working well in partnership with other bodies as listed in Appendix 2.
Members thanked the officers for their work in the progress of delivering the recovery and renewal strategy and they unanimously proposed that the Chief Executive agree the recommendations of the report.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2021/22 Revenue Budget Monitoring Report for the Period Ending 30 September 2021 PDF 435 KB Additional documents:
Decision:
Minutes: The Portfolio Holder for Finance and Legal Services thanked officers for providing a detailed report of the Councils budgets at the first half of the year. He noted there were a number of small changes within budgets and there was an allowance for the Local Government Review. There were also some changes to the earmarked reserves and changes to the revenue provision of the Council’s the two solar projects. The virement proposed would allow the retention of key staff on fixed term contracts until the vesting day of the new Unitary Authority. It was proposed to delegate the decision on Business Rates Pooling to the Chief Finance Officer until further information on the benefits of the scheme were available. A small underspend was predicted overall and he concluded by proposing the recommendations to Members.
The Scrutiny Specialist confirmed that questions raised at their meeting were answered by officers.
There was no debate and Members unanimously recommended that the Chief Executive confirm the recommendations.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2021/22 Capital Budget Monitoring Report for the Period Ending 30 September 2021 PDF 1007 KB Additional documents: Decision:
Minutes: The Portfolio Holder for Finance and Legal Services noted that since the last quarterly monitoring report, the Senior Leadership Team had reviewed the capital programme and the capital reserves had been rationalised for transparency. It was also planned to use existing reserves to fund the existing capital budget within that year which would reduce the need for external borrowing which would save on borrowing costs in the revenue budget of over £284,000. There were also a number of assumptions including the decarbonisation budget of £2.8m which was assumed to be delivered within the grant period but this may be extended and SSDC may fund elements which fell outside the criteria. The projects proposed to be removed from the capital programme were unlikely to be delivered for either external reasons, capacity issues or were no longer a priority for the Council in the Council Plan. He concluded that the Council had a large and active capital programme which had provided revenue income but due to changes to the CIPFA code it was proposed to cease borrowing to invest for revenue gain. He proposed that the recommendations be agreed by Council.
In response to questions from Members, the Portfolio Holder and Chief Finance Officer advised:
· The projects proposed to be removed from the capital programme were either unlikely to complete, due to a lack of officer capacity, or were not now a priority due to Local Government Reorganisation. · The mortgage rescue contingency had not been used for a number of years and the gypsy and traveller acquisition fund was an officer capacity issue in the remaining 16 months of the Council, but it was likely to be picked up by the new Unitary Authority. · The new car parks proposed to be removed from the capital programme would be clarified in the report to Council.
During discussion Members expressed their dismay at the proposed projects to be removed from the Capital programme and it was suggested that contractors could be brought in to deliver the projects. It was noted that the PV panels and LED bulbs proposed to be removed from the capital programme could be included as part of the decarbonisation grant scheme.
The Director for Service Delivery advised that more staff were being drawn into the Local Government Review work and did not have the capacity to deliver all of the proposed schemes.
The Deputy Chairman of the Scrutiny Committee confirmed that most of their questions were answered at the meeting or they had now been raised by the Executive.
The Chief Executive suggested that officers review the proposed schemes for removal from the capital programme at table two of the report and provide further clarity to Portfolio Holders prior to the Full Council meeting.
It was proposed to amend recommendation B toask officers to review the projects proposed to be removed from the capital programme as listed in Table Two prior to Full Council, and this was seconded. A named vote was taken and the recommendations were unanimously agreed ... view the full minutes text for item 105. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yeovil Refresh - Implementation PDF 720 KB Additional documents:
Decision:
Minutes: ThePortfolio Holder for the Yeovil Refresh said the proposed purchase of the property was key to the re-development of the whole box factory site in Yeovil.
The Commercial Property Land and Development Manager suggested that the report be discussed in confidence if any further detail was required by Members.
The Vice Chairman of the Scrutiny Committee advised that they had discussed the item in a confidential session and had raised a number of questions.
The Chairman proposed that the remainder of the report be discussed in Closed Session by virtue of the Local Government Act 1972, Schedule 12A under Paragraph 3: Information relating to the financial or business affairs of any particular person (including the authority holding that information). This was agreed by Members.
The remainder of this report was discussed in closed session at the conclusion of which, Members agreed the following recommendations and two confidential recommendations relating to financing the potential property purchase.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
District Executive Forward Plan PDF 221 KB Additional documents: Decision:
Minutes: There were no changes proposed to the Executive Forward Plan.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date of Next Meeting PDF 118 KB Minutes: Members noted that the next scheduled meeting of the District Executive would take place on Thursday 6th January 2022 as a virtual consultative meeting via Zoom meeting software commencing at 9.30 a.m.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exclusion of Press and Public PDF 209 KB Minutes:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Briefing on Local Government Reorganisation (Confidential) PDF 212 KB Minutes: The Chief Executive and the Director of Place and Recovery provided members with a brief verbal update on the progress of Local Government Reorganisation in Somerset.
|