Agenda, decisions and minutes
Venue: Council Chamber, Council Offices, Brympton Way, Yeovil. View directions
Contact: Angela Cox, Democratic Services Specialist - 01935 462148 Email: angela.cox@southsomerset.gov.uk
No. | Item | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Minutes of Previous Meetings PDF 108 KB To approve as a correct record the minutes of the District Executive meetings held on 7th November 2019 and 9th January 2020. Minutes: The minutes of previous meetings held on 7 November 2019 and 9 January 2020 were approved as correct records and signed by the Chairman. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Apologies for Absence Minutes: Apologies for absence were received from Councillors John Clark, Sarah Dyke and Henry Hobhouse. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Declarations of Interest In accordance with the Council's current Code of Conduct (as amended 26 February 2015), which includes all the provisions relating to Disclosable Pecuniary Interests (DPI), personal and prejudicial interests, Members are asked to declare any DPI and also any personal interests (and whether or not such personal interests are also "prejudicial") in relation to any matter on the Agenda for this meeting. Members are reminded that they need to declare the fact that they are also a member of a County, Town or Parish Council as a Personal Interest. Where you are also a member of Somerset County Council and/or a Town or Parish Council within South Somerset you must declare a prejudicial interest in any business on the agenda where there is a financial benefit or gain or advantage to Somerset County Council and/or a Town or Parish Council which would be at the cost or to the financial disadvantage of South Somerset District Council. Minutes: There were no declarations of interest. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Public Question Time Minutes: There were no questions from members of the public. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chairman's Announcements Minutes: The Chairman reminded members of the change of date for full Council and Area West in February. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SSDC Council Plan 2020-2024 PDF 96 KB Additional documents: Decision:
Minutes: The Specialist (Strategic Planning) presented the report which invited members to recommend the adoption of the SSDC Council Plan 2020-2024, Annual Action Plan 2020-2021 and a revised set of Key Performance Indicators.
She noted that Scrutiny Committee had made some suggested amendments: · To remove reference to the Digital Strategy as Scrutiny Committee had not considered the strategy · Priority project 5 – that milestones are taken back through Scrutiny Committee once drafted · Area Chapter (South) – Environment theme – reference to the example of Yeovil Rivers Community Trust should be removed.
During a brief discussion, members agreed that reference to the Yeovil Rivers Community Trust should be removed from the Area Chapter (South). The Chief Executive explained that the Council Plan was forward looking and detailed what would be done in the future. The Digital Strategy was an ambition and a direction, and reference to it in the Council Plan did not mean it had been agreed. He recommended keeping reference to the Digital Strategy in the Council Plan.
Subject to the amendment being made to the Area Chapter (South) to delete the agreed wording, members were content to propose the Council Plan, Annual Action Plan and key performance indicators to Full Council for approval,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2020/21 Draft Revenue and Capital Budgets and Medium Term Financial Plan PDF 224 KB Additional documents:
Decision:
Minutes: The Portfolio Holder (Finance, Legal & Democratic Services) introduced the item which set out the proposed budget and Council Tax for 2020/21, and the estimated budget for the following four years. He acknowledged the concerns raised by Scrutiny Committee regarding timeframes to consider the report, but unfortunately the situation had been unavoidable.
The Portfolio Holder (Finance, Legal and Democratic Services) then presented the report and explained the matters before members for consideration. He provided an overview of the current and future financial environment facing local authorities and highlighted key elements of the report including: · The outcome for next year’s Business Rates pooling was currently unknown , so asking for members to consider the principle. · The MTFP forecast as detailed in paragraph 12. · New Homes Bonus as detailed at paragraphs 22 and 23. · Will cease to be in the pilot area for 75% Business Rates Retention, and will revert back to 50% - detailed in paragraph 34. There was a risk the business rates pooling might not cover funding gap for regeneration programmes – detailed in paragraph 39 · Savings plans as detailed at Appendix B and that significant savings variations will be reported as part of the budget monitoring process. During a short discussion, the comments and points of detail raised by the Scrutiny Committee were noted. Members were content to propose the recommendations for confirmation by Full Council.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital, Investment and Treasury Strategies 2020/21 to 2022/23 PDF 105 KB Additional documents: Decision:
Minutes: The Portfolio Holder (Finance, Legal & Democratic Services) presented the report which informed members of the recommended strategy in relation to capital expenditure and financing, investments and treasury management activities. He thanked officers in the Finance team for all the work that had been done recently preparing various financial documents.
There was no discussion and members were content to propose the recommendations for confirmations by Full Council.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2019/20 Revenue Budget Monitoring Report for the Period Ending 31st December 2019 PDF 138 KB Additional documents:
Decision:
Minutes: The Portfolio Holder (Finance, Legal & Democratic Services) introduced the report which provided an update on the forecast revenue financial position and budgetary variations for the financial year 2019/20.
During a brief discussion some of the comments of Scrutiny Committee were noted. The Portfolio Holder (Protecting Core Services) clarified that information about the Business Case for Building Control would be included in the next Transformation update report. The Interim S151 Officer noted she had mentioned at Scrutiny Committee that the reduction in car parking income may be partly influenced by a decline in usage. Following a point of detail raised at Scrutiny Committee, she confirmed that the capital bid included in the draft budget was refurbishment of existing parking machines.
There being no further discussion, members were content to confirm the recommendations of the report.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2019/20 Capital Budget Monitoring Report for the Period Ending 31st December 2019 PDF 120 KB Additional documents:
Decision:
Minutes: The Portfolio Holder (Finance, Legal & Democratic Services) presented the report which provided an update on the forecast capital financial position and budgetary variations for the financial year 2019/20.
There was no debate and members were content to confirm the recommendations of the report.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate Performance Report 2019-20: 3rd Quarter PDF 78 KB Additional documents: Decision:
Minutes: The Specialist (Performance) introduced the performance monitoring report which presented the current position of the Council’s agreed key performance indicators. The Leader (Portfolio Holder for Strategy & Policy) commented the report was now much clearer and understandable than in the past. She felt some indicators needed to be removed but acknowledged that was not for debate at this meeting.
The Leader referred to the comments made by Scrutiny Committee and noted that responses had been provided at the Scrutiny meeting. During a brief discussion, and in response to a comment about planning performance figures, the Portfolio Holder (Protecting Core Services) commented that good work was being done and figures were correct. The Director (Service Delivery) noted that some of the Scrutiny comments were possibly in parallel with new processes and the different way of working. He acknowledged there were some issue with the change process.
At the close of discussion,members were content to note the report. The Specialist (Performance)noted a report regarding new Key Performance Indicators would be taken to District Executive and Scrutiny Committee in March for consideration.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional documents:
Decision:
Minutes: The Specialist (Compliance & Enforcement) presented the report which asked members to consider approving a time extension for two Public Space Protection Orders. He briefly explained the purpose of the two Public Space Protection Orders (PSPOs) and why the extensions of time were reccommended.
In response to queries raised at Scrutiny Committee, the Specialist noted he was satisfied there were adequate resources available across the different teams for enforcement. He provided a brief overview of how the Orders were enforced: · The process was often reactive and in response to contact from customers. · The area concerned would then be patrolled and monitored to gather. evidence · If evidence, would then look to take action and / or prosecute.
The Specialist (Compliance & Enforcement) explained what was planned for the future regarding enforcement and noted a lot of work was already underway.
During a brief discussion, some members noted there were several areas where more enforcement could be done if dedicated wardens were available, and if regenerating town centres then more types of enforcement may be needed.
At the end of discussion members were content to approve the time extensions for the two PSPOs.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Future of Local Government in Somerset PDF 627 KB Decision:
Minutes: The Chief Executive presented the report which aimed to summarise the research that the five Councils of Somerset commissioned regarding options for the future for Local Government in Somerset. The financial stability of local councils was in doubt generally, but South Somerset was currently in a good position.
The district councils preferred the direction of collaboration and integration, whereas the County Council still wished to explore unitary as their favoured approach. He explained briefly why the districts did not feel unitary was the right option going forward. The districts recommended that Option 2 (Collaboration and Integration) be fully explored and a Joint Project Board created.
During discussion, several comments were made by the Leader and other members, including: · All district Leaders had offered to attend and speak with parish and town councils to explain the district option. County were believed to be doing the same. · If combining authorities to get economies of scale may need to think larger again. · Option 2 would keep the sovereignty of the districts but they would work more closely together. · Change is necessary and inevitable due to the changes in government funding. · Fell should be a referendum to ask residents what they want. · Option 2 doesn’t require legislation and doesn’t need to be delayed.
In response to points of detail, the Chief Executive clarified there was no requirement for a referendum, and noted that if Somerset was to become unitary and the district areas disbanded, then all assets and debts would become part of the new authority.
The Leader noted it had been agreed between the districts that she and the Leader of Sedgemoor District Council be the two Leaders to lead this going forward, and would give political balance. She clarified that community consultation and engagement would included parish and town councils.
At the end of debate members. were content to propose the recommendations for approval by Full Council.
The Leader thanked the Chief Executive and officers for the huge amount of work that had been undertaken to get to this stage.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
District Executive Forward Plan PDF 73 KB Additional documents: Decision:
Minutes: The following additions and deletions to the Forward Plan were noted: · New Key Performance Indicators – addition for March 2020 · The Future of Local Government in Somerset – Business Case – addition for July 2020 (to District Executive and Council) · Budget Outturn Reports – deletion from May 2020 (as this is a duplication with July)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date of Next Meeting PDF 40 KB Minutes: Members noted the next scheduled meeting of the District Executive would take place on Thursday 5 March 2020 in the Council Chamber, Council Offices, Brympton Way, Yeovil commencing at 9.30am. |